Widescreen Gaming Forum

It's just like... I dunno... let's not talk about it. I'm tired, lol.

I've never looked up sales figures for it, I just know I have read they were dissapointing... perhaps because people waited for the bin, I dunno. It was not a very good game though, I am glad they are moving back to the original Sands of Time vibe.

Aye.

I saw some sales figures comparing console to PC sales although I can't remember what they were (more important things to remember!) and given that it was released on both the PS3 and the 360 (and there was no differentiation between the two) the console version sold terribly. Can't expect much more of the PC version then... especially when it's two platforms' sales vs. one platforms' sales. Basically, it was a shitty game that should never have been released. It's currently £10 on Amazon UK for the 360 version, £12 for the PS3 version, and £6 for the PC version.

...

As for Ruse, I'll load up the demo and see how it plays. I was utterly disappointed in SupCom2. To be honest, I've not found a great RTS in quite a while. They're either too complex to be fun, or just... crap.

Oh, for another Dune RTS. Emperor was awesome. :)

I'm not a fan of RUSE's graphics. I've tried the beta and I wasn't that impressed. It's hard not to compare it with world in conflict, which I think was a lot better.

I'm not a fan of RUSE's graphics. I've tried the beta and I wasn't that impressed. It's hard not to compare it with world in conflict, which I think was a lot better.

The graphics are different and I like the unusual approach. Its like the Team fortress of RTS, cartoony but still needs the tactics of other more serious looking RTS games.

The game appears to give the player the choice of playing from god-level to down and close (as in World in Conflict) Between the slightly different graphics and different take on the supply chain its nice to see somoen thryong something slightly different.