Matrox, for one, but there are others too.
Seek and Ye shall find.
Seeked and Ye found a "Load of Crap"!
If anyone has purchased a Matrox GFX card for gaming, they need a head exam. With the 2 ATI cards I found on Newegg, both would be lucky to run BF2 @1680x1050, let alone across 3 screens!
Wow your the one who fails, the Display Port edition of the TH2G is for... you guessed it gfx cards with display port!!!
How is it that I fail? Matrox is targeting the 5-10% of the computer population with this product. When in fact.... they needed to build a "REAL" new product for the 90+%. But no...instead of building a unit with 2 duel DVI inputs to power 3 screens, they would rather change the conections on their old product and call it New. You see....between the VGA,DVI(DIGI) and the DP models they all share 95% of the same internal componets produced 8+ years ago. This is how they FAIL!
90%>10%?
Im playing at 5040x1050 57Hz with my Matrox TripleHead2Go Digital + 3 x 22" monitors, working just fine. You failed Sir Drip, not Matrox.
Hey... nice setup you have there. I myself find that the 22" displays looks the best @5040 over the 24"and 26" displays. Im using the ViewSonic 22" displays, However due to my 1 1/2 year old GFX cards, Im having to run the latest and greatest FPS @3840 with good frames at max settings. So I guess I fail in not updating my GFX cards(waiting on the 300 series).
Oh....BTW Why the QX9650 @ $1000 bucks than the Q9650 @$300? They both have the same performance and overclock the same. Now that smells like a $700 dollar "TOTAL FAILURE" to me! But who's pointing fingers!
EDIT: Oh I see... you are harping on me from my info from my sig. I havent updated it, I think ill leave it like it is for people like you to have something to do!