Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 17:10

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 20 Nov 2009, 23:17 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders

Joined: 07 Nov 2005, 04:16
Posts: 3010
The wider the aspect ratio gets, the bigger they get.

That's not what vert - means. Nothing's being subtracted from the vertical here. What it looks like is that the larger the horizontal resolution, the bigger the HUD. I don't think we can objectively call this a WS blemish - the important thing is that the HUD stays in correct proportions.


Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 21 Nov 2009, 00:17 
Offline

Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 22:46
Posts: 144
Those elements look pretty vert- to me (is it confusing you that only parts of the 2D HUD are vert- rather than the whole game?). When the game is running at 48:10, the floating pointers and the cross-hair are the correct size for this aspect ratio:



These HUD elements are scaled with a fixed aspect ratio, expanding in accordance with the width of the screen, but ignoring the height. With a wide enough setup, even the points of the crosshair would start getting cropped off the top and bottom of the screen.

I can fake a setup that wide with SoftTH if you want me to demonstrate the cropping, but even at this size, the 3x-too-large bits make the game a bit annoying to play.


Edit: This should make it even clearer, I've overlayed the 16:10 screenshot on top of the the 48:10 one. As you can see, same size icons and crosshair.

Some of the HUD elements are being blown up to a massive 16:10 box that the 48:10 game fits inside of, then cropped to fit.



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Nov 2009, 01:36 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders

Joined: 07 Nov 2005, 04:16
Posts: 3010
You're misusing the term "vert -". Nothing is getting cropped off the top or bottom of anything. Here's what a vert - HUD looks like:

Full HUD:


Vert - HUD:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Nov 2009, 01:37 
Offline

Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 22:46
Posts: 144
Huh? That just looks stretched too wide...

I'm sticking with vert-. Certain parts of the HUD is being vertically cropped from 16:10 to 48:10.

In any case, the effects are obvious. Parts of the game expanding to 3 times their normal size in triple-head is not perfect support...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Nov 2009, 01:40 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders

Joined: 07 Nov 2005, 04:16
Posts: 3010
Certain parts of the HUD is being vertically cropped from 16:10 to 48:10.

Where? I can not see a single pixel of the HUD that has been discarded in the transition.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Nov 2009, 01:42 
Offline

Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 22:46
Posts: 144
Certain parts of the HUD is being vertically cropped from 16:10 to 48:10.

Where? I can not see a single pixel of the HUD that has been discarded in the transition.

As I said, if I enable an even wider resolution with SoftTH, the cross-hair will eventually start going off the top and bottom of the screen.

Basically, everything in the two big black bars on this shot is lost on these particular parts of the HUD:



Edit: This might make it more clear. Now, keep in mind this only effects the cross-hair and the floating weapon indicators in this screenshot. When these particular elements end up in the red boxes, they're off-screen in triplehead.



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Nov 2009, 02:01 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders

Joined: 07 Nov 2005, 04:16
Posts: 3010
As I said, if I enable an even wider resolution with SoftTH, the cross-hair will eventually start going off the top and bottom of the screen.

Just how wide is "eventually?"

When these particular elements end up in the red boxes, they're off-screen in triplehead.

The icons don't get cropped like the term "vert -" implies. They just move down a bit and arrows appeard that point upwards or downwards.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Nov 2009, 02:19 
Offline

Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 22:46
Posts: 144
As I said, if I enable an even wider resolution with SoftTH, the cross-hair will eventually start going off the top and bottom of the screen.

Just how wide is "eventually?"

8192x1050 (SoftTH's maximum width) will get some cross-hairs (such as the shutgun) to go large enough. Eyefinity with 5 monitors would be 8400x1050, so it is possible to go that wide.

I don't know why you're defending the game so adamantly. The fact that HUD elements are blowing up to 3 times (or more) their normal size should be more than enough to show something isn't right with the HUD in triplehead.

I'm going to dig around the hud config files to see if I can find a solution for this. These parts of the HUD should not be scaling like this. They appear to be scaling based on horizontal resolution alone, assuming a 16:10 aspect ratio at all times, which is why they don't just stretch 3 times too wide, but also expand vertically when they shouldn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Nov 2009, 02:40 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders

Joined: 07 Nov 2005, 04:16
Posts: 3010
8192x1050 (SoftTH's maximum width) will get some cross-hairs (such as the shutgun) to go large enough. Eyefinity with 5 monitors would be 8400x1050, so it is possible to go that wide.

Ok, I'll grant you that the crosshair is vert -, but only for quintuplehead users.

I don't know why you're defending the game so adamantly.

I insist on as much accuracy as is possible when documenting games. L4D2 isn't anything special in that regard.

The fact that HUD elements are blowing up to 3 times (or more) their normal size should be more than enough to show something isn't right with the HUD in triplehead.

Whether this is or is not a fault in TH, a game can get certified with TH-specific blemishes. And it's never been considered a problem for WS games to have enlarged HUDs.

They appear to be scaling based on horizontal resolution alone, assuming a 16:10 aspect ratio at all times, which is why they don't just stretch 3 times too wide, but also expand vertically when they shouldn't.

Actually, if the HUD is going to expand its horizontal dimension 300%, then it *should* expand the vertical equally. Otherwise the proportions are off, and this is recognized as a blemish.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 21 Nov 2009, 02:50 
Offline

Joined: 19 Apr 2008, 22:46
Posts: 144
8192x1050 (SoftTH's maximum width) will get some cross-hairs (such as the shutgun) to go large enough. Eyefinity with 5 monitors would be 8400x1050, so it is possible to go that wide.
Actually, if the HUD is going to expand its horizontal dimension 300%, then it *should* expand the vertical equally. Otherwise the proportions are off, and this is recognized as a blemish.

My point is, it shouldn't expand in any dimension. These elements should remain a constant size across all widths. I don't see why expanding only horizontally is considered a blemish, but expanding horizontally and vertically isn't being considered one at all. They're still the wrong size (the blurriness from the scaling should be enough to tell that).

These expanding bits have been game-breaking more than once already. I was totally lost because I couldn't figure out where one was trying to point me, it was so large it just seemed to dance around the screen pointing at nothing.

I've tried looking for a fix, but the relevant game files from L4D1 are not in L4D2...any ideas on where to start looking for the HUD configuration files?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 63 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 47 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group