Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 28 Nov 2024, 16:30

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3012 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272 ... 302  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012, 22:37 
Offline

Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 05:18
Posts: 58
Does anyone know if changing the executable to read only solves the issue of steam updating to a new version?


Top
 Profile  
 


 Post subject: I highly doubt it;))
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012, 22:44 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 21 May 2011, 14:18
Posts: 1232
I highly doubt it;)) Read-only is to prevent writing inside the file not changing the file alltogheter (at least on Windows)...

_________________
WideScreen Fixer... Fixes your Surround problems to give a gorgeous 3D Surround Experience!
WideScreen Fixer

Only website to show TRUE 3D Vision Surround Gaming Videos(viewable by anyone) only at
3D Vision Surround Gallery

E-mail and Paypal (for people who wants it): [email protected]


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012, 23:03 
Offline

Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 05:18
Posts: 58
I highly doubt it;)) Read-only is to prevent writing inside the file not changing the file alltogheter (at least on Windows)...


Thanks Helifax. I'm trying to help someone with their computer and they wanted to avoid the update from steam when we bring it back online and I had seen this mentioned before but wasn't sure if it would actually work. I wonder if you ran on an account without administrative privileges to write to a directory if this might work. Wouldn't this keep steam from writing the new exe? I never thought about using an approach like that so I haven't thought it through. Anyway, I will just tell him to keep his machine unplugged from the internet until he's ready to deal with the updates.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012, 23:03 
Offline

Joined: 25 Feb 2011, 06:10
Posts: 125
When you make changes to source code - no matter how slight and then recompile it, the compiler will make different decisions, do things in different orders, link in slightly different ways depends on any settings that have changed.

A few updates back the entire structure of the EXE changed requiring a fix from the bottom up, the prior patches were all just refinding the injection points which shift when the EXE changed.

is this why Beth is not supporting 3 screens? after each update?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: onthemour wrote:HaYDeN
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012, 23:10 
Offline

Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 05:18
Posts: 58
[quote]When you make changes to source code - no matter how slight and then recompile it, the compiler will make different decisions, do things in different orders, link in slightly different ways depends on any settings that have changed.

A few updates back the entire structure of the EXE changed requiring a fix from the bottom up, the prior patches were all just refinding the injection points which shift when the EXE changed.

is this why Beth is not supporting 3 screens? after each update?


I'm no expert, but it seems to me that Beth would be writing their fix into the source code rather than using a memory hack like we are using so it doesn't seem like this would be an issue for Beth if they really wanted to support multi-monitors.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: onthemour wrote:HaYDeN
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012, 23:10 
Offline

Joined: 16 Nov 2011, 05:18
Posts: 58
I hate double posting. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012, 23:12 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2008, 07:03
Posts: 96

is this why Beth is not supporting 3 screens? after each update?


I'm imagining it's because they are just a bunch of pricks. Really, this game was an xbox port, so it naturally seems little attention is being to anything pc. Profit margins, you know. It's a shame Oblivion worked so well and this one is this way. I guessing it's because it's just a crappy xbox port, but I'm also guessing that it wouldn't have taken much from the dev's to throw a little consideration into the coding for our issues.

Could be wrong, though. Coders: would it have taken much from the dev's and coders to consider this when they wrote it, or is the engine somehow made in such a way that high res options are just a crazy consideration to leave to outside fixers?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012, 23:34 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 30 Nov 2008, 07:03
Posts: 96
When you make changes to source code - no matter how slight and then recompile it, the compiler will make different decisions, do things in different orders, link in slightly different ways depends on any settings that have changed.

A few updates back the entire structure of the EXE changed requiring a fix from the bottom up, the prior patches were all just refinding the injection points which shift when the EXE changed.



Very interesting... cool, thanks! I pretty much understand in a "civilian" sort of way. Interesting to me that none of the other changes or mods suffer from this same condition though, since many change the game in pretty drastic ways. I'm guessing they're not changes to the source code then?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 29 Mar 2012, 23:52 
Offline

Joined: 11 Nov 2011, 06:34
Posts: 64
I highly doubt it;)) Read-only is to prevent writing inside the file not changing the file alltogheter (at least on Windows)...


I actually have my TESV.exe set to read only and steam has honored it... same with my skyrim.ini and skyrimprefs.ini.

I made a backup copy anyway just in case but I haven't been forced to use it.


Never mind, it just forced it. Confirming read only does NOT protect you.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Neovalen wrote:helifax
PostPosted: 30 Mar 2012, 00:08 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2010, 17:31
Posts: 55
[quote]I highly doubt it;)) Read-only is to prevent writing inside the file not changing the file alltogheter (at least on Windows)...


I actually have my TESV.exe set to read only and steam has honored it... same with my skyrim.ini and skyrimprefs.ini.

I made a backup copy anyway just in case but I haven't been forced to use it.


Never mind, it just forced it. Confirming read only does NOT protect you.


Yeah I tried this same thing and didn't save me from a forced update either. Now I have to wait for the Skyrim plugin for WSGF and Script Dragon to be updated. Thanks Steam for yet another miniscule patch that leaves me Skyrim-less. And still no toggle for kill cams?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3012 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 266, 267, 268, 269, 270, 271, 272 ... 302  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DotNetDotCom.org [Bot] and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group