Widescreen Gaming Forum

The point's been done to death. Leave it now. Any more quotes on the subject will be edited or deleted entirely.

Okay.

The point's been done to death. Leave it now. Any more quotes on the subject will be edited or deleted entirely.

I agree.

Oh here we go, lets quote sentence by sentence, and word by word, and tell the person what is wrong with the sentence and the word and why it shoudln't be used and why they are wrong and you are right.

I can't stand micro quoting and then arguing the point. If it has to get that detailed, and you have to proove yourself right, FRIGGIN DROP THE DIALOGUE.

The fact of the matter is, no one is EVER more than 50% right (otherwise you would be very wealthy due to simple maths), so let's move on and accept that other have differing opinions.

EDIT: Sorry, I didn't read past Cranky's last annoying micro quote. Still not deleting the above though.

Can we carry on with ModernwarFAIL now please?

It is hard to disagree that it HAS failed (in Australia). I was reading an Australian AusGamingMagazine today killing time in a Newsagent, they wrote an article that they were porporting that the Multiplayer for ModernWarFAIL woudl die quite quickly for PC, simply due to the fact that the Geographics and lack of good BroadBand highspeed connections would see it next to non-functional. Specially for competative gaming.

ModernWarFail
DoubleWarFail
MegaWarFail
MultiWarFail
ULTRAWARFAIL
MO MO MO MONSTERWARFAIL!

_________________
moboP8P67-M-PRO-V3 cpuI5-2500K-3.3GHZ ramOCZ8GB gpu260GTX hddOCZ-VERTEX II-SSD psuNEOHE550W hudBENQ20"

Oh here we go, lets quote sentence by sentence, and word by word, and tell the person what is wrong with the sentence and the word and why it shoudln't be used and why they are wrong and you are right.

I can't stand micro quoting and then arguing the point. If it has to get that detailed, and you have to proove yourself right, FRIGGIN DROP THE DIALOGUE.

The fact of the matter is, no one is EVER more than 50% right (otherwise you would be very wealthy due to simple maths), so let's move on and accept that other have differing opinions.

EDIT: Sorry, I didn't read past Cranky's last annoying micro quote. Still not deleting the above though.

Can we carry on with ModernwarFAIL now please?

It is hard to disagree that it HAS failed (in Australia). I was reading an Australian AusGamingMagazine today killing time in a Newsagent, they wrote an article that they were porporting that the Multiplayer for ModernWarFAIL woudl die quite quickly for PC, simply due to the fact that the Geographics and lack of good BroadBand highspeed connections would see it next to non-functional. Specially for competative gaming.

ModernWarFail
DoubleWarFail
MegaWarFail
MultiWarFail
ULTRAWARFAIL
MO MO MO MONSTERWARFAIL!

Mmmmm you only have to be ~3% right in online poker and bet big on that 3% and bet low on that 97% and you are wealthy...

:D

If micro-quotes annoy you, don't read them! Complaining that a feature of the forums gets used in a debate you aren't participating in is just silly.

And I choose not accept the "differing opinion" that ripping off gaming companies is a right, or that this right has been infringed on.

It's more that dissecting each part of a post is incredibly petty and reflects badly upon the forum and its members as a whole. Accept that your opinion is your opinion and move on.

I don't want a discussion about this now as well, as it HAS been discussed before. Subsequent posts should be on-topic of General Gaming of MW2. FOV/AR issues etc should of course go in the appropriate thread in the Request/Discuss forums.

_________________
Formerly eZ`

Follow me on twitter: @theg00seberry and find me on Steam

Posts have been removed and will continue to be ... if any more non-MW2 related posts appear, then the thread will have to be locked. I think it's probably run its course anyway.

_________________
Formerly eZ`

Follow me on twitter: @theg00seberry and find me on Steam

On topic I have to say I am dissapointed in SpecOps. Something about removing the story context from the action makes the game less enjoyable and the flaws more easily seen.

I think MW as a series just presents action extremely well, and when that presentation is removed I like it a lot less.

On topic I have to say I am dissapointed in SpecOps. Something about removing the story context from the action makes the game less enjoyable and the flaws more easily seen.

I think MW as a series just presents action extremely well, and when that presentation is removed I like it a lot less.

I haven't started spec-ops yet. But i'm going to try it in co-op with a friend. It sounded like fun to be able to do that. Did you play it singleplayer or co-op?

[quote]On topic I have to say I am dissapointed in SpecOps. Something about removing the story context from the action makes the game less enjoyable and the flaws more easily seen.

I think MW as a series just presents action extremely well, and when that presentation is removed I like it a lot less.

I haven't started spec-ops yet. But i'm going to try it in co-op with a friend. It sounded like fun to be able to do that. Did you play it singleplayer or co-op?

Single... none of my Steam friends are playing the game, lol.