Brett wrote:
Keep in mind that even if Eyefinity/Surround support is hacked or patched in, the game suffers from horrendous performance. It uses *way* more resources than it has any right to use, considering what it is. IMO Sleeping Dogs looked better, and that ran fine. If you want to run it in triple-wide, you're definitely going to need to sacrifice a lot of settings - more so than usual.
I've taken to just playing it in 1080p on my TV, unfortunately. My two 780Tis in SLI barely manage 60FPS with all the settings cranked to max in that resolution, I had to knock back the AA a bit to get it more stable. Frankly it's unacceptable IMO considering how the game looks - it's good, but not unbelievably good like. Crysis in 2007 which was a huge jump forward and required "future, yet unreleased or even unimagined hardware" to run on the highest settings. This is decidedly not that huge jump in either graphical fidelity or gameplay.
I want good textures and can ditch most other settings. AA can almost be turned off at high resolutions. Also, all sorts of focus blur and motion blur is useless. I mean, if om not looking at something its still blurred in my eyes..
Also, having the game on a dedicated SSD improves gpu memory swapping and helps fixing stuttering.
nvidia wrote a pretty good article on all the settings here if someone want to read up on performance.
http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/guides ... king-guide